Far infrared ray is part of the sunlight spectrum that is
invisible to the human eye. The complete spectrum of sunlight consists of
visible and invisible rays. The visible rays are red, orange,yellow, green,
indigo, blue, and violet in color. The invisible rays are Ultra Violet, X-rays,
Gamma, Cosmic, Microwave, Long Wave, Electrical Wave, and
Infrared.Electromagnetic waves between visible light and the microwave are
called infrared waves. The wavelength of infrared waves range from 0.76 micron
to 1,000 microns. This range is further subdividedinto the ranges of Near,
Medium, and Far-Infrared Rays with following wavelength: 0.76 to 1.5microns;
1.5 to 4 microns; and 4 to 1,000 microns respectively.Far infrared waves are
thermal. In other words, we experience this type of infrared radiation every
day in the form of heat. Unlike ultraviolet light, FIR is harmless to the body.
How Can A Fiber Emit Far Infrared Ray?
How can the bio-ceramic emit far infrared? Will there be any
side effects? Actually, the principle is very simple. It is a well-known fact
that human body constantly emits thermo energy. When the bio-ceramic is
stimulated by the thermo energy of human body, it converts it into the far
infrared rays and reflects it back into the human body. So the far infrared ray
emitted by the far infrared fiber is really powered by our own body and there
are no known side effects.
What do FIR do?
The FIRs whose wavelength falls between 4 to 50 microns are
also commonly called Biogenetic rays. Biogenetic rays have been shown to
promote the healing and growth of living cells especially inplants, animals and
human beings. All of the FIR products we make emit FIR with wavelength
concentrated between 8 to 15 microns
How can FIR heal human body?
One of the reasons that FIR has beneficial results in a
variety of illnesses is because FIR can deeply penetrate skin and underlying
tissues. When FIR penetrates the skin, they come into contactwith protein,
collagen and fats. By stimulating micro-vibrations, FIR can elevate tissue
temperatures. The human body then can be revitalized because of the improved
micro circulation.Another reason is that FIR has the ability to remove toxins
in the body, which are often at the core of many health problems. The build up
of toxins in a health body could block the normal bloodcirculation and impair
the cellular energy. When FIR waves are applied, the water molecules that
encapsulate the toxins get heat up, and start to vibrate. This vibration
reduces the ion bonds of theatoms that are holding together the molecules of
water. As the breakdown of the water molecules occurs, encapsulated gases and
other toxic materials are released and the body gets rejuvenated.In addition,
FIR also improves human health through following functions:
Rejuvenates the skin and muscle tone.
Increases oxygen in the blood cell
Promotes regeneration and fast healing
Improves the autonomic functions of the nervous system
Reduces fatty acids in the tissues
Increase metabolism between blood and tissue.
What are the symptoms that FIR
products are effective for?
FIR products have been shown to have therapeutic effect to
many chronic healthy symptoms. Enumerating all of them here might be difficult.
However, following list contains some of the symptomsthat have been shown to
respond very well to FIR products:ArthritisMuscle pain and spasmShoulder or
joint stiffnessRaymaud’s syndromeWith long sleeve shirts and long john bottoms,
FIR products have also been shown to speed up weight loss, improve immune
system and the overall health.
What is microcirculation?
Microcirculation refers to the flow of blood through the
vascular network lying between the arterioles and venules; includes
capillaries, metarterioles and arteriovenous anastomoses. The mainfunction of
microcirculation is carry oxygen and nutrition matter and ship out carbon dioxide,
lactic acid and metabolic production.
How long does it take to feel the
effects?
Time taken to feel the effect varies depends on the symptom
one has, the products one uses and personal health condition. One may start
feeling the pain relieving impacts of a knee bandimmediately, while others
wearing our garments may take several weeks to notice the profound whole body
results.Is it possible that one may not feel anything using these
products?Depends on the individual’s health needs, some time, the effects of
our products are more subtle. If you do not feel anything by using our FIR
products, your body may be healthier thanothers.In such case, using FIR garments will provide the benefits of
long term preventative therapy.
How often can I use FIR products?
Our FIR health products can be conveniently used as often as
you like, and as long as you like. Our products are very comfortable to wear
and many people use them for 8 - 10 hours a day.
Are there any side effects of FIR
products?
There are no side-effects from using FIR products. As the
body gets rid of old toxins in the body, some individuals may experience some
initial detoxification symptoms. This is usually a good signthat healing
effects of the FIR garment is working, and may be expected. If you continue
experiencing prolonged symptoms, discontinue using the product and contact your
physician.
What are your FIR products made
from?
Our FIR products are made from man-made fibers impregnated
with micro-particles of bio-ceramic powder. All of our FIR products are made
from fibers with thisadvanced technology.
What is the “bio-ceramics”?
The bio-ceramics used in the FIR production are a special
kind of natural lead free stones and minerals (like Silica Oxide (SiO2).
What is the FIR wavelength of
your product?
The recommended length of the Far Infrared wave length
is8-15 Microns.This is the wave length that can easily be
absorbed by the body.
Are FIR product washable?
Yes, FIR health products are washable: Hand wash or gentle
cycle in cold water. Detergent or mild soap can be used. Natural dry in room
temperature.
Avoid heat and
direct sunlight. dry clean, iron or bleach
Is there any age limit for using
this product?
There is no age limit for using this product. In fact, FIR
is needed from the day you were born until old age.
In Vivo. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(2):321-6. Effects of far-infrared ray on reproduction, growth, behaviour and some physiological parameters in mice. Udagawa Y, Nagasawa H. Source
Experimental Animal Research Laboratory, Meiji University, Kanagawa, Japan. Abstract
The effects of chronic exposure to far-infrared ray (FIR) on reproduction, growth, behaviour, survival time and some related parameters were examined in SHN mice. The reproductive parameters differed slightly between the females on the normal racks and those on the FIR racks, which emitted FIR from the ceiling. The age and body weight on the day of vaginal opening was lower in the experimental mice born and maintained on the FIR rack than in the control on the normal rack. In both sexes, the levels of urinary components in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control at 6-7 months of age. Spontaneous motor activity of females during the light and dark phases were higher and lower, respectively, in the experimental group than the control. The survival rate was significantly higher in the experimental group than the control. These findings suggest that FIR has 'normalization effects' on the organisms.
Frequently Asked Questions about
DRY
The Feel good Technology is a functional-finishing
for all kinds of textiles. They stay three times dry.
Dry on the inside: Moisture caused by perspiration is
quickly absorbed, transported away from the body and can evaporate faster.
Dry on the outside: Moisture is reliably repelled.
Dry in a flash: Textiles with this finishing dry
significantly faster than without it.
How does work?
The finishing combines two technologies on
just one textile: From the outside to the middle of the textile it is water
repellent, while from the inside to the middle it is treated to absorb water.
The optical, hand and air permeability features are not influenced by the
treatment.
What effect does have?
ensures a feel good effect during all activities:
Diminishes perspiration marks
Just the textile-inside absorbs moisture. That’s why
perspiration marks are as good as invisible from the outside.
Generates a cooling effect
With perspiration evaporates close to the body. This
supports the natural cooling function of the body and thus ensures more energy
during active phases.
Improved dirt and water repellence
Textiles with -finishing are water repellent and
significantly less susceptible to dirt.
What makes different from competitor products?
Is the only technology that displays hydrophilic and
hydrophobic properties on a single layered textile. The combination of water
repellence and moisture-management is unique in finishing procedures and is
patented .
Is particularly suitable for textiles that are
directly worn on the skin (next-to-skin). For instance, tee shirts, pullovers,
blouses, shirts, pants, or underwear. It makes sense for those who find
themselves time after time in intensive, hectic, or hot environments – e.g.
sport, daily work, outdoor activities or while traveling.
Is applicable on all textiles (cotton, synthetics,
etc.). Through the finishing, all natural fiber textiles (cotton or wool)
become functional, while textiles made of synthetic fibers are even more
functional.
Will the air permeability or hand properties of the material
be affected by DRY?
DRYneither has an influence on the air permeability nor
the hand properties of a material.
How long does the finishing stay intact?
The wash permanence is circa 50 washing cycles. We
recommend that textiles treated with ironed or tumble dried . No fabric softener should be used during the wash.
The feelgood effect has got weaker – what to do?
In order to guarantee the optimal function over a
longer period of time, the product should be ironed or tumble dried after
washing. Thereby the finishing can almost invariably often be regenerated.
Is there a certain washing detergent that I can’t use?
No fabric softener should be used that is water repellent or
has hydrophilic properties, or both functions would be impaired.
cold Advantages
Optimal protection from heating up due to sunlight Because textiles finished with cold heat up less in all colors compared
with material without a cold finish.
Textiles stay cool to the touch When applied to clothing this means that the wearer perspires less, feels
better and is capable of greater performance.
Reliable protection from UV rays (minimum UPF 30) Protection from UV-A und UV-B rays. UV-A rays accelerate the aging of skin.
UV-B rays cause a pigment change, resulting in long term browning. Without
effective UPF protection (Ultraviolet Protection Factor), aggressive oxygen
molecules are released which cause sunburn or which can lead to the formation
of melanoma.
FIR AND CANCER
The effects
inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells by far-infrared radiation
(FIR) are controlled by the basal expression level of heat shock protein
(HSP) 70A
Jun Ishibashi,1 Kikuji Yamashita,1 Tatsuo Ishikawa,1 Hiroyoshi Hosokawa,2 Kaori Sumida,1 Masaru Nagayama,2 and Seiichiro Kitamura1
1Department
of Oral and Maxillofacial Anatomy, Medical Science for Oral and
Maxillofacial Regeneration, Graduate School of Health Biosciences,
University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8504 Japan
2Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Science for Oral and Maxillofacial
Regeneration, Graduate School of Health Biosciences, University of
Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8504 Japan
We
developed a tissue culture incubator that can continuously irradiate
cells with far-infrared radiation (FIR) of wavelengths between 4 and
20 μm with a peak of 7–12 μm, and found that FIR caused different
inhibiting effects to five human cancer cell lines, namely A431 (vulva),
HSC3 (tongue), Sa3 (gingiva), A549 (lung), and MCF7 (breast). Then, in
order to make clear the control system for the effect of FIR, the gene
expression concerned to the inhibition effect by FIR were analyzed. In
consequence, basal expression level of HSP70A mRNA was higher in A431
and MCF7 cells than in the FIR-sensitive HSC3, Sa3, and A549 cells.
Also, the over expression of HSP70 inhibited FIR-induced growth
arrest in HSC3 cells, and an HSP70 siRNA inhibited the proliferation of
A431 cells by irradiation with FIR. These results indicate that the
effect of a body temperature range of FIR suppressing the proliferation
of some cancer cells is controlled by the basal expression level of heat
shock protein (HSP) 70A. This finding suggested that FIR should be very
effective medical treatment for some cancer cells which have a low
level of HSP70. Still more, if the level of HSP70 in any cancer of a
patient was measured, the effect of medical treatment by FIR can be
foreseen for the cancer.
Keywords: Far-infrared radiation (FIR), CO2 incubator, Heat shock protein (HSP) 70, Human cancer cell, Over expression, siRNA
Far-infrared
radiation (FIR), which causes heating, includes electromagnetic waves
with wavelengths between 4 and 1,000 μm. Recently, there have been many
studies of the effects of FIR on health and in the preservation of food.
The available evidence indicates that whole-body irradiation by FIR has
many biological effects. For example, hyperthermia (body temperature of
39–41°C) induced by whole-body FIR has been reported to substantially
inhibit spontaneous mammary tumor growth in mice [1–4]. At normal temperature ranges (approximately 25.5°C), tumor growth in SHN mice can be inhibited by FIR [5, 6].
Furthermore, whole-body FIR irradiation is believed to improve human
health and sleep by enhancing blood circulation in the skin [7, 8]. This is likely due to the ability of organic matter to absorb FIR at wavelengths between 7 and 12 μm.
The
effects of FIR, and particularly whole-body FIR, remain unclear,
because the experiments are easily affected by environmental changes in
temperature and humidity and by the presence of bacteria. Therefore, we
developed a chamber for raising animals that emits FIR upon heating and
is capable of maintaining steady conditions. This system employs a
sealed heater with a carbon/silica/aluminum oxide/titanium oxide ceramic
coating produced using a polycarbonate printing technique [9].
Using this system, we found that FIR inhibits tumor growth in the A431
tumor genesis model mouse by inhibiting the expression of matrix
metalloprotease-1, 9, 10, and 13. Recent in vitro studies by Teraoka
et al. found that FIR at wavelengths between 4 and 16 μm inhibits the
growth of HeLa cells in vitro at 37°C [10]. Despite these findings, the molecular mechanism by which FIR affects cellular gene expression remains unclear.
The
lack of data on the effects of FIR on cells is due to the difficulty in
stably irradiating cells with FIR under ideal culture conditions (i.e.,
100% humidity, 37.0 ± 0.5°C, 5% CO2) and examining the effects of FIR at the cellular level. Therefore, using a polycarbonate printing technique, we developed a CO2 incubator with a sealed heater that has a carbon/silica/aluminum
oxide/titanium oxide ceramic coating and emits FIR upon heating [11]. This CO2 incubator can stably emit FIR at wavelengths between 4 and 20 μm
(maximum at 7–12 μm) under conditions of 100% humidity, 37.0 ± 0.5°C,
and 5% CO2. Our results using this incubator indicate that a
body temperature range of FIR radiation suppresses the proliferation of
HSC3, Sa3, and A549 cells. But, A431and MCF7 was not affected. These
differences may be caused by any control system competing with FIR.
Therefore,
the gene expression concerning to the effect of inhibition by FIR are
analyzed in the present study. Still more, the effect of over expressing
and suppressing candidate FIR response genes HSP70 we examined.
As previously reported [11],
we fabricated an FIR radiant-panel incubator by coating a
carbon/silica/aluminum oxide/titanium oxide ceramic (radiation
efficiency > 97%) using a polycarbonate printing technique
(Bloodissue Co. Ltd. Tokushima, Japan). The incubator has a stably
irradiate system with FIR at wavelengths between 4 and 20 μm (maximum at
7–12 μm) under conditions of 100% humidity, 37.0 ± 0.5°C, and 5% CO2 in air.
Calculation of FIR absorbed per 10-cm tissue culture dish in the FIR incubator
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis revealed that the ceramics coating inside the CO2 incubator emits FIR at 4 W m−1 str−1 μm−1 at wavelengths between 4.486 and 20.256 μm, with a maximal emission of 11.6 W m−1 str−1 μm−1 at 9 μm, which is >95% of the emission rate of an ideal black body.
Since the ceramic coating was maintained at 40°C, the total generating
energy, integrated over the entire range of wavelengths, was calculated
to be 130.225 Wm−2 str−1. The total area of the FIR-emitting ceramic surface was 1.2385 (m2).
Therefore, the total energy emitted into the incubator was
161.28366 W/str. Assuming that FIR is emitted in all directions, the
total emission was 2026.7502 J/sec. Given that the volume of the CO2 incubator was 0.1257 m3 and the volume of culture medium was 6 ml, the amount of energy
absorbed by each 10-cm culture dish was 0.09674 J/sec. The surface area
of each 10-cm culture dish was 78.5 cm2, so that the energy reaching the base of the dish was 0.001232 J/sec/cm2. Thus, over a 1-h period 4.4352 J/h cm2 was absorbed by each 10-cm culture dish.
Cell lines and cell culture
A431
human epithelial vulva carcinoma cells and Sa3 human gingival squamous
carcinoma cells were purchased from RIKEN Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan). A
HSC3 human tongue squamous carcinoma cells, A549 human lung carcinoma
cells, and MCF7 human breast carcinoma cells were purchased from Health
Science Research Resources Bank (Sennan, Japan). A431, A549, and MCF7
cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/Ham’s F-12
nutrient mixture (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). HSC3 and Sa3 cells were
cultured in Eagle’s basal medium (Sigma). All culture medium was
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 μg/ml
penicillin G, 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 250 ng/ml amphotericin
B (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. The medium were replaced every 2 days.
Measurement of cell number and growth
Cells (5 × 104)
were plated in triplicate in 24-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark).
The attached cell populations were measured on day 8 using 0.2% Trypan
blue and a hemocytometer. Incorporation of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine
(BrdU) was used to determine the amount of DNA synthesis. DNA synthesis
by proliferating cells was assessed using a BrdU labeling and detection
kit III (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s
protocol. Briefly, cells (5 × 103 per well) were seeded in
96-well tissue culture plates (Nunc) and then placed in the FIR
incubator for 4 days, and BrdU incorporation was measured during the
logarithmic growth phase (i.e., before the cells were confluent) by
treating the cells for 4 h at 37°C with 10 μM BrdU. BrdU incorporation
was quantified by measuring the absorbance of the substrate reaction
(405 nm) and the absorbance at the reference wavelength (590 nm) using
an ImmunoMini NJ-2300 (System Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). Absorbance
values directly correlated with the amount of DNA synthesis and
therefore the number of proliferating cells.
Histochemistry
Cells were grown on 22-mm2 glass coverslips in 6-well culture dishes (Nunc). After 4 days of FIR
irradiation, the cells were observed with a CK40 phase contrast
microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), fixed, and stained with hematoxylin
and eosin. For immunofluorescent staining of heat shock protein (HSP)
70, cells were washed in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), fixed for
20 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, washed three times for 5 min each
in PBS, and blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% goat serum.
Cells were incubated at 4°C overnight in 1:200 mouse monoclonal antibody
to HSP70 (Stressgen, Victoria, Canada) in PBS containing 1 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin. After washing, the cells were incubated with 1:400 FITC
(Fluorescein isothiocyanate)-labeled goat anti mouse IgG (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The localization of intracellular
HSP70 protein was identified using a BX51 confocal microscope (Olympus)
and a Cool SNAP CF digital camera (Roper Scientific, Trenton, NJ, USA)
and calibrated using RS Image Express software (Roper Scientific).
Microarray studies and data analysis
Four
days after FIR irradiation, two control and two FIR-irradiated samples
were prepared for microarray hybridization. Total RNA was extracted
using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to
the manufacturer’s protocol. Agilent human 1A ver.2 microarray slides
(Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) were used for the
hybridization. The quality of RNA samples was monitored using an Agilent
2100 bioanalyzer (200 ng each). To produce labeled cRNA (complementary
RNA), high-quality RNA was amplified and labeled with Cy5-and Cy3-CTP
(Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) using a Low RNA Input
Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit (Agilent) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. After the amplification and labeling, the dye
incorporation ratio was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer,
and the ratios were within 10–20 pmol per μg cRNA, which is the range
suggested by the manufacturer for hybridization. For hybridization, an
Agilent 60-mer oligo microarray (Rev. 7, SSC Wash/6-screw hybridization
chamber) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly,
750 ng Cy3-labeled control and 750 ng Cy5-labeled MPP+-treated sample
were mixed and incubated for 17 h with an SSC-washed microarray slide
from an Agilent In situ Hybridization Kit. Sample pairs were dye-swapped
and processed at the same time. The washed slides were immediately
dried under a stream of ultrapure N2 in an ozone-free
atmosphere. After drying, the slides were scanned using an Agilent
Technologies Microarray Scanner with the PMT setting at 770 for Cy5 and
670 for Cy3, and the raw data were normalized and analyzed using
GeneSpring 7.0 software (Silicon Genetics, Santa Clara, CA, USA). For
normalization, per spot and per chip intensity-dependent (LOWESS)
normalization was used to correct for the intensity-dependent ratio bias12.
In addition, the following filters were applied to improve the quality
of the data: eliminate saturated signal, eliminate non uniformity of
background, eliminate non uniformity of feature, Feature Population
Outlier, eliminate low-signal feature of background signal + 2.6 × SD,
and eliminate P-value < 0.01. Genes were further classified for process and function according to their GO term information (http://www.godatabase.org).
Stable transfection of HSP70A
The HSP70A expression vector pcDNA3-HSP70A containing the cDNA for full-length human HSP70A was a generous gift from Dr. Hector R. Wong (Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). HSP70A cDNA was subcloned into the Xba I and Bam HI sites of pcDNA3.1(−) (Invitrogen). Cells grown on 60-mm dishes were
transfected with 8 μg of pcDNA3-HSP70A, or pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) using
Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. The transfected cells were selected with 400 μg/ml G418
(Sigma), and clones formed were collected and maintained separately in
medium supplemented with 400 μg/ml G418.
Total
RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the
manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the RNA
were determined spectrophotometrically. One microgram of total RNA was
reverse-transcribed into first-strand cDNA. Next, oligo(dT12–18) primer (Invitrogen), 10 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen), 25 mM MgCl2 (Promega,
Madison WI, USA), and 0.1 M dithiothreitol (Invitrogen) were added, and
the mixture was incubated for 2 min at 42°C. Next, the RT reaction was
performed by adding SuperScript II RT (Invitrogen) and incubating at
42°C for 50 min, followed by 70°C for 15 min. The reaction was
terminated by rapid cooling on ice, after which RNA in the sample was
degraded by treatment with RNase H (Invitrogen) at 37°C for 20 min.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using a 1-μl sample of
the RT reaction and Ready Mix PCR Master Mix (AB gene, Epsom, Surrey,
UK). The analyzed genes and the respective primer sequences were as
follows: HSP70A, 5′-TGTTCCGTTTCCAGCCCCCAA-3′ (sense) and 5′-GGGCTTGTCTCCGTCGTTGAT-3′ (antisense); HSP70B, 5′-CTCCAGCATCCGACAAGAAGC-3′ (sense) and 5′-ACGGTGTTGTGGGGGTTCAGG-3′ (antisense); HSP70C, 5′-TTGAGGAGGTGGATTAGGGGC-3′ (sense) and 5′-AGCCTTTGTAGTGTTTTCGCC-3′ (antisense); glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH), 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′ (antisense). PCR was carried out using cycles (30 for HSPs and 23 for G3PDH) of 94°C for 45 s, 58°C for 30 s (all HSPs) or 52°C (G3PDH),
and 72°C for 90 s. Finally, primer extension was performed for 10 min
at 72°C. A 10-μl sample of each PCR product was separated by
electrophoresis on a 1.5% polyacrylamide gel in Tris borate/EDTA buffer
and stained with ethidium bromide.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR data analysis
To
determine the level of HSP70A mRNA, quantitative real-time RT-PCR was
carried out using a LightCycler and the Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green
I Kit (Roche). The reaction contained 50 ng of cDNA and 100 pmol of
each primer in a final volume of 10 μl. The gene-specific primers were
as follows: HSP70A, 5′-TGTTCCGTTTCCAGCCCCCAA-3′ (sense) and 5′-GGGCTTGTCTCCGTCGTTGAT-3′ (antisense); and α-actin, 5′-ATAGCACAGCCTGGATAGCAACGTAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-CACCTTCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTG-3′ (antisense). The concentration of Mg2+ was 3 mM. In all cases, a first phase of denaturation was performed at
95°C for 10 min. Amplification was carried out for cycles of
denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, hybridization for 10 s (58°C for HSP70A or 60°C for α-actin), and elongation at 72°C (20 s for HSP70A or 10 s for α-actin).
Product specificity was evaluated by melting curve analysis.
Fluorescence data were analyzed using LightCycler Software Ver. 3.5
(Roche). Crossing points were established using the second derivative
method. The relative amount of target transcript in the sample was
calculated by dividing the amount of target by the amount of internal
standard (α-actin). Results were expressed as the
target/internal standard concentration ratio calculated from the
calibration curve. Since the target and internal standard genes had
different sequence and amplicon lengths, it was expected that they would
show different PCR efficiencies. Therefore, the PCR efficiency (10−1/m,
where m is the slope from the calibration curve) was first established
for each pair of primers. All reactions were performed in triplicate.
HSP70 Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA)
HSP70 protein was quantified in cell lysates using a commercially available ELISA kit for human HSP70 (Stressgen). Cells (105 per well) were seeded in 6-well plates (Nunc). After 4 days, the cells
were lysed, and all samples were assayed at optimal dilutions according
to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Protein extraction and Western blotting
Cells (1 × 106)
were grown in 60-mm tissue culture dishes (Nunc). After removing the
cell culture medium from the culture dishes (Nunc) and washing the cells
twice with cold PBS(−), the cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM
Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 μg/mL leupeptin). Protein levels were measured by the Lowry method [13]
using a DC Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Cell lysate
containing 15 μg of protein for HSP70 was subjected to Sodium Dodesyl
Sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Separated proteins
were then transferred from the gel to a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane. After blocking with 5% skim milk in PBS-Tween, the membrane
was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with primary antibody in PBS-T
containing 5% skim milk, followed by three 10-min washes with PBS-T.
Next, the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with
horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody and washed three times
for 10 min with PBS-T. Immunoreactive protein was detected using an ECL
plus kit (Amersham Biosciences) and visualization by exposure to
Hyperfilm (Amersham Biosciences). The primary antibodies used were
rabbit anti-HSP70 (Stressgen), anti α-actin (Sigma), and the secondary
antibody was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse (Zymed
Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA, USA) or anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham
Biosciences).
Small interfering RNA (siRNA)
We
designed 21-nucleotide siRNAs targeting human HSP70A and HSP70C
according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO,
USA) and corresponding to the sequence 5′-AAGAACCAGGUGGCGCUGAAC-3′. It
was not possible to design a siRNA specific to HSP70A because its mRNA
was highly homologous to the mRNA for HSP70C (see Table 1).
We used siCONTROL Non-Targeting siRNA (Dharmacon;
5′-UAGCGACUAAACACAUCAAUU-3′) as a negative control because it does not
match the sequence of any known human or mouse genes. Cells (1 × 104/well) were plated in 96-well culture dishes (Nunc) and cultured for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
When the cells reached 70–90% confluence, they were transfected with
100 nM siRNAs to HSP70A and HSP70C or control siRNAs complexed with
Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s
instructions. The growth medium was removed after 6 h, and the culture
dish was transferred to the FIR incubator. After incubation for 48 h at
37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, cell proliferation was assessed by BrdU incorporation.
Data
are means ± SE of replicate samples in single experiments or replicate
experiments as described in the figure legends. Student’s t-test
was used for comparisons between two groups. Multiple group comparisons
were performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey–Kramer multiple
group comparisons test. All statistical analyses were performed using
Statcel 2 software (OMS publishing, Saitama, Japan).
FIR irradiation selectively inhibits the growth of specific cancer cell lines
To
clarify the effect of FIR irradiation on the proliferation of cancer
cell lines, we irradiated five cancer cell lines (A431, HSC3, Sa3, A549,
and MCF7) with FIR and measured the number of live cells by Trypan blue
dye exclusion. Although the proliferation of HSC3, Sa3, and A549 cells
were significantly suppressed on day 8 of culture (45.75%, 74.63%, and
65.79%, respectively), FIR irradiation had little effect on the growth
of A431, or MCF7 cells (Fig. 1).
Effect of FIR irradiation on cell growth of five cancer cell lines. Cells (1 × 105)
were plated in 24-well dishes and cultured for 8 days. Cell numbers
were counted every other day. Although proliferation of HSC3, Sa3, (more ...)
Microarray analysis and extraction of candidate gene for FIR control
Several
gene families showed high correlations between endogenous expression
(signal in the microarray) and the growth rate, proteins involved in
cell proliferation, cytoskeletal proteins, cell cycle components, and
protein kinases. Especially, in the analysis of stress factor, some
genes encoding the HSPs which were well known that they participate in
the cellular resistance to stress were focused. Of the 35 HSP genes on
the microarray, HSP70 showed the highest correlation with the growth
rate (Fig. 2a,
b). We examined this further by real time RT-PCR, and we found that
HSP70 is most highly expressed in A431 cells at all stages of the cell
cycle. Lower levels of expression were found in HSC3 and Sa3 cells
(Fig. 2c).
We did not find a statistically significant difference between the
expression of this gene between control (unirradiated) and
FIR-irradiated A431, HSC3, or Sa3 cells. An ELISA for HSP70 in untreated
cells showed similar results, specifically, that the expression of
HSP70A was higher in A431 cells than in the HSC3 or Sa3 cells (Fig. 2d).
Relationship between the expression of HSP70 and the suppression of proliferation by FIR irradiation. (a)
Correlation between the signal from the microarray for the HSP family
members in the control group and the correlation coefficient. (b) Correlation (more ...)
Increased expression of HSP70A improves the survival of HSC3 cells after a limited exposure to FIR
To
directly determine whether HSP70 can protect cells from FIR-induced
cell death, we developed A431 and HSC3 cell lines stably expressing
human HSP70A (A431-HSP70A and HSC3-HSP70A cells, respectively).
Control cells were transfected with empty pcDNA3.1 (A431-Neo and
HSC3-Neo; Fig. 3a,
b). In our initial experiments, we found that exposure of HSC3 and Sa3
cells but not A431 cells to limited FIR causes G2/M arrest and induces
partial hypertrophy to necrosis (data not shown). To determine whether
increased expression of HSP70A confers protection against FIR,
cell survival was examined in FIR-irradiated A431-HSP70, A431-Neo,
A431-wt, and HSC3-HSP70, HSC3-Neo, and HSC3-wt cells. We found that over
expression of HSP70A increased cell proliferation in A431 and
HSC3 cells. Furthermore, the proliferation of FIR-irradiated and control
(unirradiated) A431-HSP70A cells was similar (Fig. 3c).
The survival rate after 6 days of FIR irradiation was significantly
higher in HSC3-HSP70A cells than in HSC3-Neo or HSC3-wt cells. In
addition, the proliferation of FIR-treated HSC3-HSP70A cells was similar
to that of control HSC3-HSP70A cells. BrdU incorporation was
significantly higher in FIR-irradiated or control A431-HSP70A cells than
in A431-Neo or A431-wt cells (Fig. 3d).
Although BrdU incorporation of FIR-irradiated HSC3-wt and HSC3-Neo
cells was lower than in unirradiated HSC3-wt and HSC3-Neo cells, it was
similar in FIR-irradiated and unirradiated HSC3-HSP70A cells.
Surprisingly, BrdU incorporation by HSC3-HSP70A cells was significantly
higher in both FIR-irradiated and unirradiated cells. These data
demonstrate that over expression of HSP70A in HSC3 and A431 cells did
not affect their proliferation, and also their morphology, even when
they were irradiated with FIR (Fig. 3e).
Over expression of HSP70 prevents the suppression of cell growth and induction of cell hypertrophy by FIR. (a) Real-time RT-PCR of HSP70 expression. Cells overexpressing HSP70 were established. (b) Representative Western blots demonstrating increased (more ...)
Knocking down HSP70A by using siRNA improves the deth of HSC3 cells after a limited exposure to FIR
We
next examined the effect of knocking down HSP70A and HSP70C mRNA and
HSP70 protein expression using siRNA. Transfection with HSP70A/C siRNA
effectively decreased HSP70A and HSP70C mRNA (Fig. 4a) and protein levels (Fig. 4b)
in both A431 and HSC3 cells without affecting the level of HSP70B mRNA
or protein. HSP70A/C siRNA did not suppress BrdU incorporation in
unirradiated A431 cells, but it suppressed BrdU incorporation in cells
irradiated with FIR (Fig. 4c).
Similarly, the HSP70A/C siRNA enhanced the suppression of BrdU
incorporation by FIR irradiation. FIR irradiation also significantly
suppressed BrdU incorporation in HSC3 cells transfected with the
negative control siRNA (Fig. 4c).
These results indicate that a decrease in HSP70 protein mediates the
ability of limited FIR to inhibit the proliferation of A431 and HSC3
cells.
Inhibition
of HSP70 expression and BrdU incorporation in A431 and HSC3 cells after
48 h of transfection with 100 nM HSP70 siRNA. (a) RT-PCR of HSP70A, HSP70B, and HSP70C in A431 and HSC3 cells after treatment with siRNAs. C, wild-type (more ...)
In
the present studies, we showed that FIR suppresses the proliferation of
HSC3, Sa3, and A549 cell lines. Two other cell lines, A431 and MCF7,
showed almost no growth arrest in response to FIR. The effect of FIR
does not seem to be related to the cell type or source, because these
three cell lines have different origins: HSC3 is from a tongue squamous
cell carcinoma, Sa3 is from a gingival squamous cell carcinoma, and A549
is from a pulmonary adenocarcinoma. FIR was found to cause hypertrophy
without apoptosis in all three sensitive cell lines, although there was a
slight increase in necrosis in the Sa3 cells by histological
observation. In addition, the expression of apoptosis-related genes was
unchanged in the FIR-sensitive cells by microarray analysis. Overall,
FIR seemed to cause changes in the cytoskeleton, suppress proliferation,
and induce some necrosis without apoptosis. These results raise the
question of why proliferation of A431 and MCF7 was not suppressed by
FIR. Perhaps something in certain cancer cell lines is present for
resistance to FIR. We then focused on genes encoding the HSPs, which are
well known to participate in the cellular resistance to stress. We
found that HSP70 showed the highest correlation with the growth rate of
cancer cells affected by FIR in 35 HSP genes on the microarray system.
The
expression of HSP70A mRNA was higher in FIR-insensitive A431 and MCF7
cell lines than in FIR-sensitive HSC3, Sa3, and A549 cell lines,
although the gene expressions were not induced by FIR. This finding was
confirmed by analysis of the expression of HSP70 mRNA and protein with
real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These results suggested that the
effect on body temperature range by FIR, suppressing the proliferation
of some cancer cells, may be controlled by the basal expression level of
HSP70A. To test this hypothesis, the effects of overexpression and
suppression of the HSP70 gene were studied. As a result, the overexpression of HSP70 inhibited FIR-induced growth arrest in HSC3 cells and an HSP70 siRNA
inhibited the proliferation of A431 cells by FIR. These results
confirmed that the effect on body temperature range by FIR, suppressing
the proliferation of some cancer cells, is controlled by the basal
expression level of HSP70A.
HSP70 appears
to be present in a variety of normal cell types and its expression may
be induced by several stressors, such as hyperthermia, cardiac ischemia,
infection, UV radiation, endotoxin, and nitric oxide to suppress or
denature any foreign protein and restore an injured protein from lethal
effects [12].
HSP70 seems to be particularly important for cancer cells. In human
breast cancer, the expression of HSP70 correlates with increased cell
proliferation, poor differentiation, lymph node metastases, and poor
therapeutic outcome [13].
In vivo animal studies and clinical trials have revealed that
hyperthermia may serve as a powerful tool in the treatment of prostate
cancer [14–19];
at the cellular level, hyperthermic stress induces HSPs. Moreover,
chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin, adriamycin, and bleomycin, as
well as γ-radiation induce HSPs. HSP70 participates in cytoprotection
and is associated with cellular resistance to lethal external effects [17–20].
However, in the present study, HSP70 was never induced by FIR. These
results suggested that FIR has anti-tumor activity without inducing
HSP70 as an anti-stress factor. This characteristic indicates that FIR
may be suitable for medical treatment.
Neutralization
of the function of HSP70 or inhibition of its expression may inhibit
tumor growth and/or sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents
without affecting normal cells. Furthermore, inhibition of HSP70
expression reduces cell survival. Conversely, microinjection of an
HSP70-neutralizing antibody increases the vulnerability of cells to
damage by sub-lethal temperatures [21, 22].
This finding was consistent with our results for FIR and the suggestion
of HSP70 as the acting mechanism. However, FIR may be regarded as a
sub-lethal stress that avoids an anti-stress reaction in some cancer
cells.
This is the first report
suggesting that HSP70 may not rescue cells from the effects of FIR,
although HSP70 is known to rescue cells from tumor necrosis,
factor-induced caspase-independent programed cell death, heat shock,
serum starvation, and oxidative stress [23].
This finding suggests that the effect of FIR may be a sub-lethal stress
for cancer cells protected by HSP70 as an anti-stress protein. In other
words, FIR may be a very effective medical treatment for some cancer
cell lines that have a low level of HSP70. Furthermore, if the level of
HSP70 in any cancer of a patient is measured, the effect of medical
treatment by FIR on the cancer may be predicted.
Conclusion
It
was found here for the first time the effect on body temperature range
by FIR in several cancer cell lines in vitro, which is controlled by
endogenous HSP70 to protect cells from FIR-induced growth arrest. This
finding suggests that FIR may be a very effective medical treatment for
some cancer cell lines that have a low level of HSP70. Furthermore, if
the level of HSP70 in any cancer of a patient is measured, the effect of
medical treatment by FIR on the cancer may be predicted.
Acknowledgment
This
research was supported in part by the following grants: Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry, 41104503; Toseki Matera f19008001.
1.Udagawa
Y, Nagasawa H, Kiyokawa S. Inhibition by whole-body hyperthermia with
far-infrared rays of the growth of spontaneous mammary tumours in mice.
Anticancer Res 1999;19(5B):4125–30. [PubMed]
2.Udagawa
Y, Nagasawa H. Effects of combined treatment with coffee cherry and
whole-body hyperthermia on the growth of spontaneous mammary tumours in
SHN mice. In vivo 2000;14(3):431–5. [PubMed]
3.Udagawa
Y, Inada K, Nagasawa H. Inhibition by single whole-body hyperthermia
with glucose administration of the growth of spontaneous mammary tumors
in mice. Jpn J Hyperthermic Oncol 2000;16:229–36.
4.Nagasawa
H, et al. Different schedules of whole-body hyperthermia with or
without glucose for the inhibition of mammary tumors and uterine
adenomyosis in SHN mice. Bull Sch Agr, Meiji Univ 2001;127:43–51.
5.Udagawa
Y, Nagasawa H. Effects of far-infrared ray on reproduction, growth,
behaviour and some physiological parameters in mice. In vivo
2000;14(2):321–6. [PubMed]
6.Nagasawa
Y, Udagawa Y, Kiyokawa S. Evidence that irradiation of far-infrared
rays inhibits mammary tumour growth in SHN mice. Anticancer Res
1999;19(3A):1797–800. [PubMed]
7.Inoue S, Kabaya M. Biological activities caused by far-infrared radiation. Int J Biometeorol 1989;33(3):145–50. [PubMed]
8.Honda K, Inoue S. Sleep-enhancing effects of far-infrared radiation in rats. Int J Biometeorol 1988;32(2):92–4. [PubMed]
9.Hosokawa
H, et al. A new animal raiser : effect of limited infrared radiation on
tumor growth of A431 cells. ITE Lett 2005;6(6):597–602.
10.Teraoka F, Hamada Y, Takahashi J. Bamboo charcoal inhibits growth of HeLa cells in vitro. Dent Mater J 2004;23(4):633–7. [PubMed]
11.Yamashita
K, et al. Development of CO2 incubator with limited far-infrared
radiation for activation of glucose metabolism. ITE Lett 2005;6(5):53–7.
12.Wong
HR, et al. Increased expression of heat shock protein-70 protects A549
cells against hyperoxia. Am J Physiol 1998;275(4 Pt 1):L836–41. [PubMed]
13.Nylandsted
J, Brand K, Jaattela M. Heat shock protein 70 is required for the
survival of cancer cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;926:122–5. [PubMed]
14.Kaplan
I, Kapp DS, Bagshaw MA. Secondary external-beam radiotherapy and
hyperthermia for local recurrence after 125-iodine implantation in
adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1991;20(3):551–4. [PubMed]
15.Kaver
I, Ware JL, Koontz WW Jr. The effect of hyperthermia on human prostatic
carcinoma cell lines: evaluation in vitro. J Urol 1989;141(4):1025–7. [PubMed]
16.Paulus
JA, et al. Heat shock protein response in a prostate tumor model to
interstitial thermotherapy: implications for clinical treatment.
Prostate 1993;23(3):263–70. [PubMed]
17.Roigas
J, et al. Effects of combined treatment of chemotherapeutics and
hyperthermia on survival and the regulation of heat shock proteins in
Dunning R3327 prostate carcinoma cells. Prostate 1998;34(3):195–202. [PubMed]
18.Servadio C, Leib Z. Local hyperthermia for prostate cancer. Urology 1991;38(4):307–9. [PubMed]
19.Yerushalmi
A. Localized, non-invasive deep microwave hyperthermia for the
treatment of prostatic tumors: the first 5 years. Recent Results Cancer
Res 1988;107:141–6. [PubMed]
20.Bellmann
K, et al. Heat shock protein hsp70 over expression confers resistance
against nitric oxide. FEBS Lett 1996;391(1–2):185–8. [PubMed]
21.Kiang
JG, Tsokos GC. Heat shock protein 70 kDa: molecular biology,
biochemistry, and physiology. Pharmacol Ther 1998;80(2):183–201. [PubMed]
22.Riabowol
KT, Mizzen LA, Welch WJ. Heat shock is lethal to fibroblasts
microinjected with antibodies against hsp70. Science
1988;242(4877):433–6. [PubMed]
23.Vargas-Roig
LM, et al. Heat shock proteins and cell proliferation in human breast
cancer biopsy samples. Cancer Detect Prev 1997;21(5):441–51. [PubMed]